However, times have changed and a glut of new tools are available to use. We identify a particular problem with material from online repositories.īibliographic databases such as Web of Science and Elsevier’s Scopus were once standard tools that academics used on a regular basis to locate literature that they should either consult, read or include as a citation in their work. While data quality is good for journal articles and conference proceedings, books and edited collections are often wrongly described or have incomplete data. We present some systematic tests of the quality of bibliographic data exports available from Google Scholar. Testing Google Scholar bibliographic data: Estimating error rates for Google Scholar citation parsing
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |